The concept of wikis are incredible. The ability to constantly update, edit, and add information on literally any topic is awesome and which is more often than not quite accurate. I find the whole process of wikis pretty interesting. Although many who contribute aren't "experts," the users usually have a good idea of what they're talking about. This is the beauty of the application, people from all types of backgrounds are usually pretty knowledgeable in some area. Whether that be molecular biology or a certain baseball team, there is a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.
This steps right into my next argument. Although the quality of information cannot be guaranteed on a wiki, with the policing of others who use the site, the information is usually reliable. At the same time, while teachers or instructors argue about the lack of quality of information, a number of textbooks used in the classroom have errors in them as well. Now although I am not arguing for all term papers to have Wikipedia as their main source, site similar to Wikipedia serve a great function in that they offer a plethora of knowledge that is quite easy to obtain.
"A People's History of American Empire" by Howard Zinn
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good comments Jon.
ReplyDelete